nanog mailing list archives
Re: 192.0.1.0/24?
From: Marco Davids <mdavids () forfun net>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 01:54:50 +0200
Doug Barton schreef op 18-04-15 om 01:52:
Harley is correct that 192.0.1/24 is mentioned in 1166, but AFAICS after cursory examination it has fallen through the cracks since then.
It has been seen in the wild a few times though (for whatever reason...) https://stat.ripe.net/192.0.1.0%2F24#tabId=routing -- Marco
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME-cryptografische ondertekening
Current thread:
- 192.0.1.0/24? Harley H (Apr 17)
- Re: 192.0.1.0/24? Trent Farrell (Apr 17)
- Re: 192.0.1.0/24? Josh Luthman (Apr 17)
- Re: 192.0.1.0/24? Harley H (Apr 17)
- Re: 192.0.1.0/24? manning (Apr 17)
- Re: 192.0.1.0/24? Marco Davids (Apr 17)
- Re: 192.0.1.0/24? Marco Davids (Apr 17)
- Re: 192.0.1.0/24? Chuck Anderson (Apr 17)
- Re: 192.0.1.0/24? Harley H (Apr 17)
- Re: 192.0.1.0/24? Doug Barton (Apr 17)
- Re: 192.0.1.0/24? Marco Davids (Apr 17)
- Re: 192.0.1.0/24? Leo Vegoda (Apr 27)