Re: 192.0.1.0/24?

[manning <bmanning () karoshi com>]

nothing that is authoritative (anymore)…   1996-2000

last century, 192.0.0.0/24 and 192.0.1.0/24 were identified as usable address blocks, post-CIDR testing/evaluation.
they were both earmarked for use in the (then) four new root servers (which became J, K, L, and M)…  they were
then supposed to be used as the blocks for the root zone distribution masters.

ICANN emerged and claimed them for itself, at one point using them for internal ICANN networking.
I lost interest/control at that point and don;t know what happened after that.


manning
bmanning () karoshi com
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102



On 17April2015Friday, at 13:26, Harley H <bobb.harley () gmail com> wrote:

> It is mentioned in RFC 1166 as "BBN-TEST-C". I suppose it's still not
> publicly allocated.
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>
> wrote:
>
> > No one?
> >
> > http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-192-0-0-0-0/pft
> >
> >
> > http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28692406-Outgoing-traffic-to-192.0.1.0-port-1000-
> >
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Harley H <bobb.harley () gmail com> wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone know the status of this netblock? I've come across a malware
> > > sample configured to callback to an IP in that range but it does not
> > > appear
> > > to be routable. Yet, it is not mentioned in RFC 5735 nor does it have any
> > > whois information.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Harley