Re: Consumer products with baked-in VLAN tagging

[Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com>]

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
> On 05/04/2015 03:32, Robert Seastrom wrote:
> > As you may know if you've played around with recent Apple Airports
> > (Express at least) in bridge mode with "guest network" turned on, they
> > seem to know about 802.1q and have fairly reasonable or at least
> > defensible behavior out of the box - that is to say they move the
> > "native" SSID as untagged, and the "guest" SSID tagged 802.1q VLAN
> > 1003.
> >
> > This behavior does not appear to be field-modifyable.

I do wish they had bufferbloat-fighting queue managment on the ISP
side, it is otherwise
pretty good hardware.

Do they also supply that vlan to the ethernet?

How is their ipv6 with comcast?

> Didn't know about that trick.
>
> I'm going to immediately enable vlan 1003 on the cisco switch that my
> express is connected to.
>
> Nick



-- 
Dave Täht
We CAN make better hardware, ourselves, beat bufferbloat, and take
back control of the edge of the internet! If we work together, on
making it:

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/onetswitch/onetswitch-open-source-hardware-for-networking