Re: Saying goodnight to my GSR

[Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net>]

    Well,

    I think it was just blind fear talking.

    Properly configured, it is less a security issue than newer devices.

    Pretty impressive from Matthew to have the patience/skills to not
simply "reload" that fridge over the years.

On 09/20/14 16:25, Keith Medcalf wrote:
> And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sterling
> > Sent: Saturday, 20 September, 2014 12:06
> > To: Bacon Zombie
> > Cc: nanog () nanog org
> > Subject: Re: Saying goodnight to my GSR
> >
> > Again, you're focusing resentment towards someone who did the right
> > thing. Negative reinforcement will discourage others from taking
> > action and will discourage them from encouraging others to take
> > action.
> >
> > Let's focus on who still has vulnerable equipment and how to help
> > them. Let's not shame people who did the right thing
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Bacon Zombie <baconzombie () gmail com>
> > wrote:
> > > OK thank you for decommissioning this.*
> > >
> > > * Only if you either had authority to do so for max 1 year or had no
> > > authority but were fighting to have it patches or replaced for years.
> > > On Sep 20, 2014 7:54 PM, "Daniel Sterling" <sterling.daniel () gmail com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bacon Zombie <baconzombie () gmail com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
> > > > Isn't the better response, thank you for decommissioning it?
> > > >
> > > > Can someone from cisco set up a poll or release whatever numbers they
> > > > have about how many of these old devices are still in service?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Dan