Re: Marriott wifi blocking

[Michael Van Norman <mvn () ucla edu>]

> > > My reading of this is that these features are illegal, period. Rogue AP
> > > detection is one thing, and disabling them via network or
> > > "administrative" (ie. eject the guest) means would be fine, but
> > > interfering with the wireless is not acceptable per the FCC regulations.
> > >
> > > Seems like common sense to me. If the FCC considers this 'interference',
> > > which it apparently does, then devices MUST NOT intentionally interfere.
> >
> > I would expect interfering for defensive purposes **only** would be
> > acceptable.
>
> What constitutes "defensive purposes"?

Since this is unlicensed spectrum, I don't think there is anything one has
a right to defend :)

/Mike