nanog mailing list archives

Re: large BCP38 compliance testing


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:54:32 +1000


In message <20141002224754.GA7606 () gsp org>, Rich Kulawiec writes:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:24:18PM -0400, Brian Rak wrote:
What about providers who knowingly allow IP spoofing, because it's
profitable?

What about providers who knowingly host massive spam operations, because
it's profitable?  As in:

      http://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/networks/

We've been down this road before.  Unless there is prompt, concerted,
collective action (as there was AGIS) then there is zero reason for those
behind such operations to do anything but keep collecting dirty money.

So it's all good and well to *know* where the problems are: that's
useful.  But if the goal is to actually make the problems go away,
then that'll require fingers on keyboards implementing null routing,
firewalling, blacklisting etc.

Or it will require legislation and I will assure that whatever is
written not be liked.  On the other hand everyone one in the country
will be in the same boat.

---rsk
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: