Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out

[David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>]

Faisal,

On Oct 8, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <faisal () snappytelecom net> wrote:
> So, this is more of a 'opinion' / 'feel' (with all due respect) comment, and not something which has a (presently) 
> compelling technical reasoning behind it ?

The technical reasoning behind /48 has been documented in many places.  Lots of folks, particularly those who’ve 
struggled with justifying their “need” for IPv4 have developed “‘opinion’ / ‘feel’” about conserving address space. If 
you remove the limitations of IPv4 in terms of quantity of address space, what are the compelling technical reasons for 
longer than /48?

Regards,
-drc