nanog mailing list archives

Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions


From: "Paul S." <contact () winterei se>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:06:49 +0900

I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as justification these days, sadly.

Good luck nonetheless.

On 11/10/2014 午後 11:00, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
Hey,

VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
certain restraints, we have to go down this route.

/Ruairi

On 10 November 2014 14:38, Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata () gmail com> wrote:

Couldn't you put a router or VPN system on the single IP they are giving
you and use RFC1918 addressing space?

OOB doesn't normally justify a /24 let alone a /23.

On 10 November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll () gmail com>
wrote:

Dear List,

I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggling to
find a provider who can give me a 100Mbit port (With a commit of about
5-10Mbit) with a /23 or /24 of public space , for OOB purposes. We had
hoped to use Equinixs services, however they're limiting us to a single
public IP.

I'm also open to other solutions - xDSL or similar, but emphasis is on
cheap and on-net.

Cheers
/Ruairi




Current thread: