nanog mailing list archives

Re: Observations of an Internet Middleman (Level3) (was: RIP


From: Scott Helms <khelms () zcorum com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:44:55 -0400

Mark,

 I don't think that anyone disputes that when you improve the upstream you
do get an uptick in usage in that direction.  What I take issue with is the
notion that the upstream is anything like downstream even when the capacity
is there.  Upstream on ADSL is horribad, especially the first generations
(g.lite and g.dmt).


Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------


On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:

On Friday, May 16, 2014 05:35:39 PM Jay Ashworth wrote:

Could you expand a bit, Mark on "Social media forces the
use of symmetric bandwidth"?  Which social media
platform is it that you think has a) symmetrical flows
that b) are big enough to figure into transit symmetry?

What we saw with FTTH deployments is that customers uploaded
more videos and photos to Youtube, Facebook, MySpace, e.t.c.
They didn't do this on ADSL as much (it's too frustrating).

When that caught on, customers started buying online backup
services - synchronizing backups of their home or office
computers to remote backup infrastructure. Again, they never
did this with ADSL.

What we learned: don't take it for granted that you will
always know what your customers (or the content providers
who serve them) will do with the bandwidth. If they have it,
expect the worst, and plan for it as best you can.

Mark.



Current thread: