nanog mailing list archives
Re: US patent 5473599
From: Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 07:31:00 -0400
And that's why C. should use a more appropriate example to defend his position. By this thread, I suspect, that whoever dealt with those different organization for OpenBSD & CARP, lacked the skills to accomplish the task and got shut down for being an ass. PS: Being of the Church of FreeBSD, I freely acknowledge that I got no clue about the scope of the drama that CARP was involved with. But I was aware of Cisco/VRRP/HSRP patent and CARP and found CIsco to be a bit of a bully to actually enforce it for such a simple technology. That being said, I was never attracted to OpenBSD for some "gut" reason... I know why now =D ----- Alain Hebert ahebert () pubnix net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 On 05/07/14 20:56, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2014 17:10:32 -0700, "Constantine A. Murenin" said:Also, would you please be so kind as to finally explain to us why Google can squat on the https port with SPDY,Because it doesn't squat on the port. It politely asks "Do you speak SPDY, or just https?" and then listens to what the other end replies.
Current thread:
- Re: US patent 5473599, (continued)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Valdis . Kletnieks (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Constantine A. Murenin (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Blake Dunlap (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Laszlo Hanyecz (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 08)
- Message not available
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Nick Hilliard (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Nick Hilliard (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Geraint Jones (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Alain Hebert (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Owen DeLong (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 TGLASSEY (May 07)
- RE: US patent 5473599 Leo Vegoda (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 David Conrad (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Matt Palmer (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Rob Seastrom (May 07)
- Please moderate yourselves, was: Re: US patent 5473599 joel jaeggli (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Robert Drake (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Owen DeLong (May 07)