nanog mailing list archives
Re: US patent 5473599
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 15:09:55 -0700
CARP uses a VRRP version number that has not been defined by VRRP, hence there is no conflict there, either. The link from the quote above has a quote from Henning.
Which means that in addition to squatting on the VRRP port, they are also squatting on a version number that I'm betting the IETF did not grant to them for that purpose and may use for another purpose at a later date. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Valdis . Kletnieks (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Constantine A. Murenin (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 David Conrad (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Constantine A. Murenin (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 David Conrad (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Constantine A. Murenin (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Jared Mauch (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Constantine A. Murenin (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Owen DeLong (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Constantine A. Murenin (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Valdis . Kletnieks (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Constantine A. Murenin (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Blake Dunlap (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Laszlo Hanyecz (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 08)
- Message not available
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Nick Hilliard (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Nick Hilliard (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Constantine A. Murenin (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Valdis . Kletnieks (May 06)