nanog mailing list archives

Re: misunderstanding scale


From: Timothy Morizot <tmorizot () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:37:16 -0500

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Alexander Lopez <alex.lopez () opsys com>wrote:

not to mention the cost in readdressing your entire network when you
change an upstream provider.

Nat was a fix to a problem of lack of addresses,  however, the use of
private address space 10/8, 192.168/16 has allowed many to enjoy a simple
network addressing scheme.


Which is, of course, precisely the use case that ULA and NPTv6 (RFC 6296,
not to be confused with a non-existent NAT66) addresses....


Current thread: