nanog mailing list archives
Re: valley free routing?
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 14:52:34 -0500
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
I think you have the right of it. That the recipient elects only to use the link for a limited set of destinations is an ordinary part of transit service. In Randy's example, a peering link was converted to a transit link on a short term basis.you know the term?
Hi Randy, For my interests I don't care about the duration. Five minutes or five years it's all the same to me. I care about the characteristics of the relationship while it's ongoing. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
Current thread:
- RE: valley free routing?, (continued)
- RE: valley free routing? Siegel, David (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? Blake Dunlap (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? JÁKÓ András (Mar 06)
- Re: valley free routing? Joel Maslak (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 06)
- Re: valley free routing? Randy Bush (Mar 06)
- RE: valley free routing? Siegel, David (Mar 07)
- Re: valley free routing? William Herrin (Mar 07)
- Re: valley free routing? Randy Bush (Mar 07)
- Re: valley free routing? William Herrin (Mar 07)
- RE: valley free routing? Siegel, David (Mar 07)
- Re: valley free routing? William Herrin (Mar 06)