nanog mailing list archives
Re: valley free routing?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:41:52 +0000
once upon a time, provider A and provider P were having a peering war, and provider V provided valley transit for P's prefixes to A. it was not meant to be seen publicly, but the traceroutes were posted to nanog, or maybe it was com-priv at the time. this is far from the only time this has happened. randy
Current thread:
- valley free routing? William Herrin (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? William Herrin (Mar 05)
- RE: valley free routing? Siegel, David (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? Blake Dunlap (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? JÁKÓ András (Mar 06)
- Re: valley free routing? William Herrin (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? Joel Maslak (Mar 05)
- Re: valley free routing? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 06)
- Re: valley free routing? Randy Bush (Mar 06)
- RE: valley free routing? Siegel, David (Mar 07)
- Re: valley free routing? William Herrin (Mar 07)
- Re: valley free routing? Randy Bush (Mar 07)
- Re: valley free routing? William Herrin (Mar 07)
- RE: valley free routing? Siegel, David (Mar 07)
- Re: valley free routing? William Herrin (Mar 06)