nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cheap LSN/CGN/NAT444 Solution


From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:05:58 +0700


On Jun 30, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Simon Perreault <simon () per reau lt> wrote:

Why? Cause that (per-subscriber limits on ports and memory) is exactly what we recommend in RFC 6888...

<https://app.box.com/s/a3oqqlgwe15j8svojvzl>

I can't tell you how many times I've received frantic 4AM calls about NATted wireless networks going down due to this 
sort of thing.  It's a real problem.

Also, there are horizontal behaviors which are undesirable, as well.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

                   Equo ne credite, Teucri.

                          -- Laocoön


Current thread: