nanog mailing list archives

Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:52:45 -0700


On Jun 19, 2014, at 10:51 , Barry Shein <bzs () world std com> wrote:


On June 19, 2014 at 04:01 owen () delong com (Owen DeLong) wrote:
ICANN != a good sampling of number resource issues or concerns.

As you noticed, the whole mess with domain names and their IP issues
is the monetary tail that wags the ICANN dog. ICANN barely pays attention
to number resources and when they do, it’s primarily to do whatever has
been agreed upon by the policy processes in the various RIRs.

This is actually a good thing and we should seek to preserve this fact
after ICANN loses its “adult supervision”.

Really. You're really completely discounting ICANN in having any
leadership or participative role in the IPv4/IPv6 transition?

No. They have some role. They just don't have any leadership role and are
not a point to apply any meaningful pressure.

Owen


Current thread: