nanog mailing list archives

Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion


From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:43:18 -0700

My Apple TV appears to use IPv6, but since there's no UI for it (last I checked) I had to disable SLAAC on that subnet 
to keep it from trying to use my slow connection.

So in my book, "some" v6 support is actually worse than "none"

Matthew Kaufman

(Sent from my iPhone)

On Jun 18, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:


However, I also don't think consumer education is the answer:
http://www.wleecoyote.com/blog/consumeraction.htm
Summary: Until it is perfectly clear why a consumer needs IPv6, and what
they need to do about it, consumer education will only cause fear and
frustration, which will not be helpful. This is a technology problem, not
a feature problem, and consumers shouldn't have to select which Internet
to be on.

Lee

Short of consumer education, how do you expect to resolve the issue where $CONSUMER walks into $BIG_BOX_CE_STORE and 
says "I need a router, what's the cheapest one you have?"

Whereupon $TEENAGER_MAKING_MINIMUM_WAGE who likely doesn't know DOCSIS 2 from DOCSIS 3, has no idea what IP actually 
is, and thinks that Data is an android from Star Trek says "Here, this Linksys thing is only $30."

Unless/until we either get the stores to pull the IPv4-only stuff off their shelves or educate consumers, the 
continued deployment of additional incapable equipment will be a continuing problem. As bad as the situation is for 
cablemodems and residential gateways, at least there, an educated consumer can make a good choice. Now, consider 
DVRs, BluRay players, Receiver/Amplifiers, Televisions, etc. where there are, currently, no IPv6 capable choices 
available to the best of my knowledge.

Owen



Current thread: