nanog mailing list archives

Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600routers.


From: Massimiliano Stucchi <stucchi-lists () glevia com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:14:50 +0200

On 10/06/14 12:28, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:

You mean it’s more likely people acquire/merge with other companies for IP space then go through transfer?  
https://www.arin.net/knowledge/statistics/

You have to consider that most likely there will be an increase in
de-aggregation due to:

- The RIRs allocating smaller and smaller address space to every member,
even smaller than a /24;

- The RIRs allocating from smaller, fragmented allocations received from
IANA.  This means that it would also be possible - in theory - for
example, to receive an allocation for a /22, sparse in two,
non-contiguous, /23s (or a similar situation).

- The holders of large parts of address space monetizing via transfers,
thus fragmenting even more.

Ciao!

-- 

Max


Current thread: