nanog mailing list archives

Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity


From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:40:16 +0530

5 too. Agglutinating multiple separate problems into a single complex title
2 regulation solution

Enough hot air driven thrust is being generated to ensure porcine aviation
too, as section 3 assures us.
 On 26-Jul-2014 6:32 am, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:10:09 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
The debate is dominated by the parties of the first part unfortunately
(and
add professors of law to this already toxic mix)

So what you're saying is that the debate is in total violation of
RFC1925, section 4? :)



Current thread: