nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:22:34 -0700
On 7/16/14, 3:57 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Indeed. We've heard this at each turn of the bandwidth crank from OMG JPG's! to OMG VoIP!On Jul 13, 2014, at 09:09 , nanog () brettglass com wrote:If Netflix continues on its current course, ALL ISPs -- not just rural ones, will eventually be forced to rebel. And it will not be pretty.I don't think so. I think the reality is that access providers have been trying to find ways to force content providers to subsidize their business and avoid charging their customers accurately for a long time and that continuing to do so is damaging to everyone involved.
to OMG HD! to OMG Quantum Teleportation! (ok, maybe not the last. yet.)Nobody's owed a business model, and we all know it's messy around the edges. Suck it up,
and maybe your customers will too. Mike
Current thread:
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix, (continued)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix jim deleskie (Jul 13)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Matthew Petach (Jul 13)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Todd Lyons (Jul 13)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Matthew Petach (Jul 13)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Jimmy Hess (Jul 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix nanog (Jul 13)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Matthew Kaufman (Jul 15)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Owen DeLong (Jul 16)
- RE: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Frank Bulk (iname.com) (Jul 13)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Owen DeLong (Jul 16)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Michael Thomas (Jul 16)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Baldur Norddahl (Jul 17)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Miles Fidelman (Jul 14)
- Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix Jared Mauch (Jul 14)
- provisioning (was: endless pissing about vz and netflux) Randy Bush (Jul 14)