nanog mailing list archives

Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto


From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 15:27:17 -0500

On 7/3/2014 3:31 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:00 PM, David Hofstee <david () mailplus nl>
wrote:
About #3... I had a little discussion on abuse-wg@RIPE a while ago
about keeping records up to date and relevant. See below.

Nobody at RIPE cares much at the moment (to actually pick up this
subject). Maybe they need a push with a TerexRH400.

You get a lot of network and DNS types and maybe 1% of them will be
concerned with the mechanics of abuse prevention - that's the other
group down the hall, and "they are not the internet police".

Which, I maintain,, is why the "manifesto" needs to be recast for Management, because it is Management that is supposed to define mission goals and job assignments, which might very well involve operation as network police for the local piece of The Internet (which does in fact extend to the end devices in your shop).

  Ah
well .. maybe that's better than hamfisted lanham act takedowns of
whitehat dynamic dns providers - but those are two extremes.


--
Requiescas in pace o email           Two identifying characteristics
                                        of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio      Infallibility, and the ability to
                                        learn from their mistakes.
                                          (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)


Current thread: