nanog mailing list archives

Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects

From: Job Snijders <job.snijders () hibernianetworks com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:38:11 +0100

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:

    bgpq3 works great the as-set that was borking rtlookup generate a
~183k long prefix list =D.


I recommend using it like this, to enable aggregation where possible: bgpq3 -A 

Kind regards,

Job

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Job Snijders (Jan 30)
  - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Tore Anderson (Jan 30)
    - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
    - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Darren O'Connor (Jan 30)
    - While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects ML (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Nick Hilliard (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)