nanog mailing list archives

Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects

From: ML <ml () kenweb org>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:07:51 -0500

+1   Easiest to use by far.

Only thing I see as lacking for easy adoption is canned solution formanaging the push to the routers.




On 1/31/2014 9:04 AM, Job Snijders wrote:

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 08:58:06AM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:

     IRRToolset 5.0.1 (rtconfig really) finally gave out on a pretty
messy RPSL parse.

     After a few hours of research, it seems that its dead since 2009 :(.

     There is some effort at http://irrtoolset.isc.org to reboot
development, its pretty dead since 2012-07-31.

     Beside home made solutions, there seems to be no commercial package.

     Any lead will be appreciated.

I really like bgpq3 for prefix-filter generation.

     http://github.com/snar/bgpq3
     http://snar.spb.ru/prog/bgpq3/

Kind regards,

Job

Current thread:

Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Job Snijders (Jan 30)
  - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Tore Anderson (Jan 30)
    - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
    - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Darren O'Connor (Jan 30)
    - While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects ML (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Nick Hilliard (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)