nanog mailing list archives
Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:22:08 +0000
On 18/01/2014 04:09, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
Does anyone have any experiences or insights to share on how more (or less) efficient routing is with IPv6? Any specific thoughts with respect to how the following characteristics help or not with routing efficiency? - fixed header size - Extension header chain - flow labels in header - no intermediate fragmentation - no checksums
extension headers are a poor idea because it's troublesome to process them on cheap hardware. Because of this, packets with any sort of extension headers are routinely dropped by a large percentage of organisations. Flow labels are generally unused (i.e. set to zero by many host stacks). Nick
Current thread:
- Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mukom Akong T. (Jan 17)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Nick Hilliard (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Saku Ytti (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mukom Akong T. (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Nick Hilliard (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mukom Akong T. (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Saku Ytti (Jan 19)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Saku Ytti (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Nick Hilliard (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Mukom Akong T. (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Frank Habicht (Jan 18)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Owen DeLong (Jan 21)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Frank Habicht (Jan 21)
- Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency Owen DeLong (Jan 21)