nanog mailing list archives
Re: Proxy ARP detection
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:16:50 -0600
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>wrote:
That wasn't the question. The question was what equipment would send proxy ARP replies as broadcasts, possibly causing poisoning in other routers (which still sounds far-fetched to me).
Which current routers will actually _listen_ to a broadcast ARP response involving an IP address that is outside the subnet assigned to that IP interface, and override the routing table with that entry? -- -J
Current thread:
- Re: Proxy ARP detection, (continued)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Niels Bakker (Jan 15)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Clay Fiske (Jan 15)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Niels Bakker (Jan 15)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Clay Fiske (Jan 15)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Eric Rosen (Jan 15)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 15)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Jimmy Hess (Jan 15)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Vlade Ristevski (Jan 16)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Niels Bakker (Jan 16)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Warren Bailey (Jan 16)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Jimmy Hess (Jan 16)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection Niels Bakker (Jan 16)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection (was re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes) ML (Jan 15)
- Re: Proxy ARP detection (was re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes) Jimmy Hess (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Niels Bakker (Jan 15)
- Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes Niels Bakker (Jan 15)