Re: Proxy ARP detection (was re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes)

[ML <ml () kenweb org>]

On 1/15/2014 6:31 PM, Clay Fiske wrote:
> Yes, yes, I expected a smug reply like this. I just didn’t expect it to take so long.
>
> But how can I detect proxy ARP when detecting proxy ARP was patented in 1996?
>
> http://www.google.com/patents/US5708654
>
>
> Seriously though, it’s not so simple. You only get replies if the IP you ARP for is in the offender’s route table (or 
> they have a default route). I’ve seen different routers respond depending on which non-local IP was ARPed for. And 
> while using something like 8.8.8.8 might be an obvious choice, I don’t care to hose up everyone’s connectivity to it 
> just to find local proxy ARP offenders on my network.
>
> -c

Shouldn't ARP inspection be a common feature?