Re: Charging fee for BGP prefix per /24?!

[Yucong Sun <sunyucong () gmail com>]

It is not the same thing though. In my case, they just say we want you to
buy our IP, if you don't and want use you own Arin allocated IP blocks
through bgp, then we got to charge you anyway!

Because why couldn't they?

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014, 00:21 Maximilian Baehring <maximilian () baehring at>
wrote:

> Europe: It costs 50 euros yearly fee per PI-Space Resource without the
> anouncment ppayable via a LIR. They cahreg - in my case - additional 25
> Euros for the financial transaction with Ripe. The cheapest possible
> anouncment is via TWO Route-Servers and the minimum required for this is a
> VPS (not openVZ which cannot run the routing daemon) Linux-KVM with Quagga!
> http://www.openpeering.nl/shoppinglist.shtml - http://www.ripe.net/lir-
> services/member-support/info/billing/billing-procedure-and-
> fee-schedule-2014
>
> mit freundlichem Gru&SZlig; / Yours sincerely
>
> Maximilian Baehring
> Hoelderlinstrasse 4
> 60316 Frankfurt a.M.
> Germany
> maximilian () baehring at
> Fon: +49 (0)69 17320776
> Fon: +49 (0)176 65605075
> Fon: +49 (0)174 3639226
> Fax: +49 (0)69 67831634
>
> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> mQGiBFRbtw0RBACmtrehmuVpR0EiXlEcdl9AttnGlK7BvVidu+EEJAg8bpnzxZ3G
> nGF2Z4LDSnEJid4nDs4ey7lAlkQ0bVozcmutyCvQo2JXNwjtVlMFR3ePuHGcgn6i
> 55bFw2aMhth5d//3MoYAXk/PeFH2zZtWwq6WVIYN4YIIPLT/j7nEElndnwCglQHs
> jDVQcAGmqZeJBA+j2SwIIjMD/1yy/tq7qyQ2O12+f4mIVLNY6+lTmg9jQu3y0jiw
> fT7xKQ3e4YSsYUxZM03Uw8XHL9OqDhKROppx1D0ywSaHzdFi14VBU0B1rv5ZUFbF
> IkO06R8dFl8HOoEwaplPtr1e6b17oM0KkLRf15nPi39pmnr8IYtpArQTV83Twmgz
> L65vA/47+UZi618F5UafoXqmRPoSnz7Bcfrk84I8WmSDqXY/VqD35DdYFz0pzCY9
> R2wk7ivxfF/cbPSrq9WUqbDGlcso96FlbqWdtPROuQQqepn3giOxDTY5RqhG0M3d
> IVdja94U08K7ypbI7pPJbl8fb8wSJ0qHdRvnvx5HnHqXd/uA4LQsTWF4aW1pbGlh
> biBCYWVocmluZyA8bWF4aW1pbGlhbkBiYWVocmluZy5hdD6IYwQTEQIAIwUCVFu3
> DQIbAwcLCQgHAwIBBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEH2oe7epzbrju5cAn3P3
> 0/S+fIMLHYUCDBIpeEl/Cw5uAJ9smUUUHwh2M0SkJAxEmec4mpaDI7kBDQRUW7cN
> EAQAkHhbnFMtkJeMbyb9HnlwGRQ8/W2NV4mfHTce/c2ggtionOYcPi1BXBN2Nq/w
> knfQDAbnwrSk21xZ//BN8CE570cEGgLAN3ILyvmjXwBtLfKDpe/RYVskjxFgMtQ1
> lz7BiU9MfrVDWKNP1PJPSAAjcWPPgIJVzFjbIrOC1DKeR9sAAwUD/RsSBkJVmfA3
> NnK/vRnZMQ9sgUiXVYblJHXxnCvGVSz6rWRdR3jrQrALYeCkqbGEZAoX7PhLUwG5
> +c+nwhbKgnSI5VkwTxTf5To/sKfGY/ZU7uVKdNT3OG6fon5kSv+1neXD2ekFoD5G
> NV2DqzaXq4kjIi3gfgU0PpeMpHyNsyA7iEkEGBECAAkFAlRbtw0CGwwACgkQfah7
> t6nNuuMXqQCZAfBvDdJ/9S8qK6u/yVo6t9cxtpkAn3XJsfNKK4YwRgL68p6eK8uA
> +VIJ
> =kOqh
> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+maximilian=baehring.at () nanog org] On
> Behalf Of Yucong Sun
> Sent: Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2014 07:27
> To: NANOG
> Subject: Charging fee for BGP prefix per /24?!
>
> Hi,
>
> My recent inquiry to some network provider reveals that they are charging
> fee for per /24 announced. Obvious that would means they get to charge a
> lot with little to none efforts on their side.
>
> In a world we are charging total bytes transferred instead of bps on
> uplinks, i can't say I'm surprised that much. But does anyone else had same
> experience? Did you pay? Is this the new status quo now?
>
> Thanks.