nanog mailing list archives
Re: Public DNS64
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:46:21 +1000
In message <53EE8A4B.9000101 () jima us>, Jima writes:
On 2014-08-15 16:11, Mark Andrews wrote:For a public DNS64 service you also need a public NAT64.Not necessarily. If the public DNS64 server is using the well-known prefix 64:ff9b::/96 (from RFC6052), then all an eyeball network needs to do is route that /96 toward their own NAT64 environment. Jima
I can see a transfer request being made to TEXAS-WESLEYAN-UNIVERSITY for 64.64.64.0/24. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Public DNS64 Tim Durack (Aug 15)
- Re: Public DNS64 Rubens Kuhl (Aug 15)
- Re: Public DNS64 Tim Durack (Aug 15)
- Re: Public DNS64 Mark Andrews (Aug 15)
- Re: Public DNS64 Jima (Aug 15)
- Re: Public DNS64 Mark Andrews (Aug 15)
- Re: Public DNS64 Tim Durack (Aug 15)
- Re: Public DNS64 Rubens Kuhl (Aug 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Public DNS64 Mark Andrews (Aug 15)
- Re: Public DNS64 Larry Sheldon (Aug 15)
- Re: Public DNS64 Jima (Aug 15)
- Re: Public DNS64 Niels Bakker (Aug 16)