nanog mailing list archives

RE: Mikrotik RouterBoard and Ubiquiti Networks Routing and Switching Solutions


From: "Tony Wicks" <tony () wicks co nz>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:05:41 +1200

Personally I have a simple matrix for routing and switching, if the customer can afford it I use Juniper, if they can 
afford it and really want Cisco then I will use Cisco. If the customer wants to put something in that will "just work" 
for years to come I use Juniper. If they want the cheapest routing solution that will do the job I will use MikroTik. 
If I was building a service provider that was not huge out of my own money then I would use Juniper switches and 
MikroTik routing/BNG. I have actually found MikroTik to be very stable and scalable over the years and I have had great 
support from them. In the early years (10 years ago) I saw some BGP instability under load, but not for several years.  
MikroTik's also make a great CPE device (Ethernet only). I have not used MikroTik switches so can't comment on them.

cheers


I am interested to hear opinions on Mikrotik and Ubiquiti Networks 
routing and switching products. I know both hardware providers are 
widely deployed in WISP networks, but I am less interested in their 
wireless solutions and more in their wired products.

I know most of their switches and routers are software based, but that 
might not necessarily be a bad thing since everyone is going to SDN 
anyways. Their products are 1/10th or less of the cost of the 
equivalent Cisco/Juniper products.


Ubiquiti routers use Cavium chips so they are not 100% software solutions, having a bit of programmable hardware 
support.
Although most Mikrotik products are 100% software-based, their flagship router nowadays, CCR, also has similar hardware 
acceleration from Tilera.




Current thread: