nanog mailing list archives
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 07:40:50 +0200
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 02:01:28 PM Måns Nilsson wrote:
It is better, both for the customer and the provider.
If the provider is able to deliver 1Gbps to every home (either on copper or fibre) with little to no uplink oversubscription (think 44x customer-facing Gig-E ports + 4x 10Gbps uplink ports), essentially, there is no limit to what services a provider and its partners can offer to its customers. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Jul 31)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics mcfbbqroast . (Jul 31)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics mcfbbqroast . (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics John Osmon (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Corey Touchet (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics mcfbbqroast . (Jul 31)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Leo Bicknell (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Aug 01)