nanog mailing list archives

Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report

From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:39:09 -0400

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:59:43 -0400, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:

On Apr 28, 2014, at 19:41, Chris Boyd <cboyd () gizmopartners com> wrote:
I'm in the middle of a physical move.  I promise I'll take the 3 deagg'd
/24s out as soon as I can.

Do not laugh. If everyone who had 3 de-agg'ed prefixes fixed it, the table
would drop precipitously. We all have to do our part.


Do we have a handle on what percent of the de-aggrs are legitimate attempts
at TE, and what percent are just whoopsies that should be re-aggregated?

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

The Cidr Report cidr-report (Apr 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Apr 11)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Apr 18)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Apr 25)
  - We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 25)
    - RE: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Andy Davidson (Apr 28)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Chris Boyd (Apr 28)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 28)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 28)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Charles Gucker (Apr 28)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Apr 29)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 29)
    - RE: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Kate Gerry (Apr 29)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report ML (Apr 29)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Paul S. (Apr 29)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Jérôme Nicolle (Apr 30)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Jérôme Nicolle (Apr 30)
    - Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report Owen DeLong (Apr 29)

(Thread continues...)