nanog mailing list archives

Re: DMARC -> CERT?


From: Laszlo Hanyecz <laszlo () heliacal net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:25:46 +0000

By their statement it's obvious that yahoo doesn't care about what they broke.  It's unfortunate that email has become 
so centralized that one entity can cause so much 'trouble'.  Maybe it's a good opportunity to encourage the affected 
mailing list subscribers to use their own domains for email, and host it themselves if possible.

-Laszlo


On Apr 14, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net> wrote:

Isn't it the other way around?  They don't want their users to be able to send to mailing lists.  They receive 
traffic from the lists just fine.  Their policy considers only effects mail originating from their users.  Yahoo 
subscribers can receive messages form nanog just fine, but they can't send to it.

Miles

Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
I don't see what the big deal is here.  They don't want your messages and they made that clear.  Their policy 
considers these messages spam.  If you really want to get your mailing list messages through, then you need to evade 
their filters just like every other spammer has to.

-Laszlo


On Apr 14, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net> wrote:

Well... how about this, from Yahoo's own posting:
We know there are about 30,000 affected email sending services, but we also know that the change needed to support 
our new DMARC policy is important and not terribly  difficult to implement.

To me - this sure looks, smells, and quacks like a denial-of-service attack against a system I operate, and the 
subscriber to the lists that I support -- somewhat akin to exploding a bomb in a public square, and then taking 
credit for it.

Miles Fidelman

-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra




-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra





Current thread: