nanog mailing list archives
Re: DMARC -> CERT?
From: Laszlo Hanyecz <laszlo () heliacal net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:56:46 +0000
I don't see what the big deal is here. They don't want your messages and they made that clear. Their policy considers these messages spam. If you really want to get your mailing list messages through, then you need to evade their filters just like every other spammer has to. -Laszlo On Apr 14, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net> wrote:
Well... how about this, from Yahoo's own posting: We know there are about 30,000 affected email sending services, but we also know that the change needed to support our new DMARC policy is important and not terribly difficult to implement. To me - this sure looks, smells, and quacks like a denial-of-service attack against a system I operate, and the subscriber to the lists that I support -- somewhat akin to exploding a bomb in a public square, and then taking credit for it. Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
Current thread:
- DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Matthew Petach (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Laszlo Hanyecz (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? William Herrin (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Laszlo Hanyecz (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Christopher Morrow (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Florian Weimer (Apr 21)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Matthew Petach (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Jim Popovitch (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Scott Howard (Apr 14)
- Re: DMARC -> CERT? Matthew Petach (Apr 14)