nanog mailing list archives

Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage

From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:56:06 -0400

The most "sane" out-of-mind response should only be sent *if* the
out-of-mind person is named explicitly as a recipient in the RFC822
header.  Anything To: somelist@somehost does not qualify :)


Funny story:  When I was at IBM I filed that as a bug with Lotus
Notes.  The Notes team rejected the bug.

-Jim P.

Current thread:

Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage, (continued)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Rich Kulawiec (Apr 09)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Tom Simes (Apr 09)
  - Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 09)
- Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Dave Crocker (Apr 09)
  - Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage John Levine (Apr 09)
    - Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage William Herrin (Apr 09)
    - Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 09)
    - Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Ted Hatfield (Apr 09)
    - Re: hack #2 for Yahoo DMARC breakage John R. Levine (Apr 09)
    - Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jeff Kell (Apr 09)
    - Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 09)
    - Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage bmanning (Apr 09)
    - Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage Jeff Kell (Apr 09)
    - Re: autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage John R. Levine (Apr 09)
    - Re: autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage Christopher Morrow (Apr 09)
    - Re: autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage George Michaelson (Apr 09)
    - Re: autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage Dave Crocker (Apr 09)
    - Re: procmail, was autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage John R. Levine (Apr 09)
    - Re: procmail, was autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage George Michaelson (Apr 09)
    - Re: procmail, was autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage Jack Bates (Apr 10)
    - Re: procmail, was autoresponding to Yahoo DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 10)

(Thread continues...)