nanog mailing list archives

Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region

From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:21:45 +0100

On 23/09/2013 15:14, Geoff Huston wrote:

I'm sorry, but I'm still confused, as I see your comment as one that relates to the
size of the payload field here, as distinct from the support for 32 bit AS numbers
per se.


hence my original comment about being usable on nontrivial transit
networks, where having the size of the community local administrator >=
your customer asn bitfield size is a rather useful feature.

There's also a serious vendor support problem at the moment.

Nick

Current thread:

Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Sep 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Sep 13)
- Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Sep 20)
  - 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region (was: Re: Weekly Routing Table Report) John Curran (Sep 22)
    - Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Nick Hilliard (Sep 23)
    - Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Geoff Huston (Sep 23)
    - Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Job Snijders (Sep 23)
    - Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Geoff Huston (Sep 23)
    - Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Nick Hilliard (Sep 23)
    - RE: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region R. Benjamin Kessler (Sep 23)
    - Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Nick Hilliard (Sep 23)
    - RE: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Leo Vegoda (Sep 23)
    - Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 23)
- Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Sep 27)