nanog mailing list archives
Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region
From: Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:14:21 +1000
On 24/09/2013, at 12:02 AM, Job Snijders <job.snijders () atrato com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:28:58PM +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:On 23/09/2013, at 8:01 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:I look forward to the day when we have proper 32 bit BGP community support and ASN32s finally become usable on nontrivial networks.Is there some reference that describes the problems with the use of RFC5668? I was not aware that there were residual issues here.It would've been really nice if one could fit more than 16 bit in the locally administrated part. Kind regards, Job
I'm sorry, but I'm still confused, as I see your comment as one that relates to the size of the payload field here, as distinct from the support for 32 bit AS numbers per se. Geoff
Current thread:
- Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Sep 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Sep 13)
- Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Sep 20)
- 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region (was: Re: Weekly Routing Table Report) John Curran (Sep 22)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Nick Hilliard (Sep 23)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Geoff Huston (Sep 23)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Job Snijders (Sep 23)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Geoff Huston (Sep 23)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Nick Hilliard (Sep 23)
- RE: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region R. Benjamin Kessler (Sep 23)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Nick Hilliard (Sep 23)
- RE: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Leo Vegoda (Sep 23)
- 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region (was: Re: Weekly Routing Table Report) John Curran (Sep 22)
- Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 23)