nanog mailing list archives

Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region


From: Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:14:21 +1000


On 24/09/2013, at 12:02 AM, Job Snijders <job.snijders () atrato com> wrote:

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:28:58PM +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:

On 23/09/2013, at 8:01 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:

I look forward to the day when we have proper 32 bit BGP community
support and ASN32s finally become usable on nontrivial networks.


Is there some reference that describes the problems with the use of
RFC5668? I was not aware that there were residual issues here.

It would've been really nice if one could fit more than 16 bit in the
locally administrated part. 

Kind regards,

Job


I'm sorry, but I'm still confused, as I see your comment as one that relates to the
size of the payload field here, as distinct from the support for 32 bit AS numbers
per se.


   Geoff








Current thread: