nanog mailing list archives
Re: iOS 7 update traffic
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:08:02 -0700
On 9/19/13 3:57 PM, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
1) Rate limit the software update download ("Us") 2) Have device OS download the update in the background, and be resilient to failures with retries ("Manufacturer") 3) Don't present the update notification to the user until the update blob is already cached on the device ("Manufacturer")
Even in this case, this comes down to a whole bunch of consumers going to the general menu selecting software update and selecting check for software update. So insuring that consumers don't have the opportunity to retrieve something that they want when they want it would be part of a solution. some large fraction of the devices will be soaking this up over the next couple days rather than yesterday some won't get it for quite some time. Software distribution can handle this, they could have been pushing unreleased software blobs for a couple weeks for example, as some steam game launches do for example. But, if you support near instantanious gratification then, when somebody asks for something, then you start fulfilling it.
Only in a perfect world though. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:49 PM, joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com <mailto:joelja () bogus com>> wrote: On 9/19/13 3:29 PM, Warren Bailey wrote: > Your software updates (you meaning a user of the Internet) should not affect my experience. I'm not advocating we go back to 5.25 floppies and never look back. I'm asking.. > > Is there a way for a COMPUTER and PHONE manufacturer to distribute their software without destroying most last mile connectivity? > > Who else has had traffic surges like this? Flash traffic occurs, sometimes people fly planes into things, sometimes nuclear reactors melt down, earthquakes or hurricanes occur or cables are segmented due to underwater landslides. and what infrastructure that is left shifts abruptly from terrestrial to sattelite or gets droppped on the floor. the best you can ask for on an instantanious basis is graceful degredation under load. this happens to not be weather.so maybe you can do something about it. but ultimately a certain number of bytes have to be transfered and given the architecture, the flash was driven by the consumer and not by software automation, if we want the later to control it consumer choice has to be taken out of the loop, which may or may not be palatable. > And who else has a Nanog strike team coming in screaming buy more bandwidth? ;) > > > Sent from my Mobile Device. > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Ryan Harden <hardenrm () uchicago edu <mailto:hardenrm () uchicago edu>> > Date: 09/19/2013 3:04 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net <mailto:jeroen () mompl net>> > Cc: "<nanog () nanog org <mailto:nanog () nanog org>>" <nanog () nanog org <mailto:nanog () nanog org>> > Subject: Re: iOS 7 update traffic > > > > On Sep 19, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net <mailto:jeroen () mompl net>> wrote: > >> On 09/19/2013 12:06 PM, Ryan Harden wrote: >>> As a side note, how are some of you not aware of this? This has happened with every single Apple OS update since the iPhone was released in 2007. >> >> The difference is there are now a "couple" more million devices out there than there were in 2007. And in 2007 there was just the one phone, now you have tablets and what have you. > > The effect has been relatively the same regardless of how many iDevices there are. Network Operators have seen spikes during Apple OS releases since they started. The only leeway I'll give you is that the original iPhone only supported 802.11b. With .11n and someday .11ac, the ability for these devices to consume data at a faster rate is also increasing. > >> >>> This isn't a new phenomenon. I realize some of you are too cool for Apple >> >> Lame low ball remark, however I thought it was the opposite, Apple==coolness? > > This was in no way meant to be a lowball remark. But it doesn't take much searching to find people exclaiming how they have zero Apple devices or how they don't pay attention to Apple's "iJunk". I assumed (probably mistakenly) that the lack of knowing this is going to happen roughly 2-3 times a year was due to being 'too cool' to keep up with the stuff Apple puts out. > >> >> Regards, >> Jeroen >> >> -- >> Earthquake Magnitude: 5.3 >> Date: 2013-09-19 17:25:09.350 UTC >> Location: 19km ESE of Ishikawa, Japan >> Latitude: 37.0716; Longitude: 140.6495 >> Depth: 22.22 km | e-quake.org <http://e-quake.org> >> > >
Current thread:
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic, (continued)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Warren Bailey (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Ryan Harden (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Fred Reimer (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Warren Bailey (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Jeroen van Aart (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Ryan Harden (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Warren Bailey (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic joel jaeggli (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Brandon Galbraith (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic joel jaeggli (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic TR Shaw (Sep 20)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Octavio Alvarez (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 19)
- RE: iOS 7 update traffic Keith Medcalf (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic joel jaeggli (Sep 19)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Colin Alston (Sep 22)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic John Smith (Sep 23)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Neil Harris (Sep 23)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Glen Kent (Sep 23)
- Re: iOS 7 update traffic Simon Leinen (Sep 23)