nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles
From: Mark Seiden <mis () seiden com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 21:48:24 -0700
On Sep 3, 2013, at 9:12 PM, ML <ml () kenweb org> wrote:
On 9/3/2013 11:57 PM, Scott Howard wrote:Overall this is nothing new - Hotmail has been doing the same thing for years. ScottWhen I used to use Hotmail - Your account was dropped after 30-60 days of non-use. Whereas Yahoo kept accounts active forever until recently.
as an ex yahoo security guy for many years, my recollection is this isn't the case. starting 8-10 years ago accounts which went dormant for extended times had actions taken on them. e.g. free accounts not logged into for a while (order of a year) had their old email archived, or maybe even erased, i am not recalling exactly which... accounts already in that inactive state could at any point have their names reclaimed, but the process of doing that was (as i recall) a manual and infrequent one. i remember it happening two or three times over about 8 years, so that would make it a big batch about every year or two. (several kinds of accounts, such as paid accounts, accounts managed for partners such as sbc and rogers, and those deactivated for abuse were kept around forever in the deactivated state so they couldn't be ever reregistered and reused for similar abuse.) (yahoo internally understands the difference between the old account and the newly registered eponymous account because account registration date (at the granularity of a week) is logically part of the yahoo id whenever ids are used, exported, compared with other ids, looked up or stored in databases, etc..) (it was a fairly common bug we would find in our security reviews for programmers to ignore the regweek, for example, when exporting lists of ids for some purpose). btw: i don't think it's so unreasonable to treat a free account that hasn't been logged into for 2-3 years as abandoned. i agree it can have unfortunate side effects (particularly domain name takeover of long-registered names). in its early days, one of the reasons people switched to gmail was that they could get a better name there than e.g. blah32975 () yahoo com. (this was slightly exacerbated because for a number of years if someone had mis () yahoo com, the cohort address in other ccTlds such as blah32975 () yahoo co uk was also not available to be registered.) approximately 5 years ago, yahoo split out some populous countries into their own name spaces, which made a lot more names available to be registered. there was a land rush, in fact, to register "good names", and some people were not-so-amusingly trying to sell them.
Granted it's been >15 years since I've used a Hotmail account regularly. Microsoft *may* change their policies more often than that.
Current thread:
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles, (continued)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Jay Ashworth (Sep 05)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Warren Bailey (Sep 05)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Kee Hinckley (Sep 06)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Jay Ashworth (Sep 06)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Kee Hinckley (Sep 06)
- RE: Yahoo is now recycling handles Keith Medcalf (Sep 07)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Kee Hinckley (Sep 08)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Randy (Sep 08)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles ML (Sep 03)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Mark Seiden (Sep 03)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Jared Mauch (Sep 04)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Randy Bush (Sep 03)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Nikolay Shopik (Sep 04)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles John Levine (Sep 04)
- Re: Yahoo is now recycling handles Masataka Ohta (Sep 04)