nanog mailing list archives

Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX


From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:36:48 +0200

* nick () foobar org (Nick Hilliard) [Thu 19 Sep 2013, 01:38 CEST]:
On 18/09/2013 23:55, Niels Bakker wrote:
Ding ding ding! And that's why honest IXPs graph both, to show that they have no packet loss on their inter-switch links.
If in > out, it's not necessarily inter-switch packet loss. The difference between the two will also include packet loss for same-switch egress traffic on customer ports.

That's absolutely true, I was a bit too glib in the quoted mail.


        -- Niels.


Current thread: