nanog mailing list archives

Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects?


From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:11:52 -0700

It's a pretty normal situation.  even with a 1-2m jumper I see light levels that are well below the maximum rx levels 
for 10km optics. e.g. the max might be .5 and the actual readings are -1.4 - -2.7. our WDM terminals sit in the the 
adjacent racks to the pop routers so they're all like that. 

ER/ZR is another matter.

On Oct 19, 2013, at 7:33 PM, Chris Costa <ccosta92630 () gmail com> wrote:

What are the opinions/views on attenuating short, 1310nm LR cross-connects.
Assume < 20m cable length and utilizing the same vendor optics on each
side of the link.  Considering the LR transmit spec doesn't exceed the
receiver's high threshold value do you pad the receiver closer to the
median RX range to avoid potential receiver burnout over time, or just
leave it un-padded?

Thanks


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Current thread: