nanog mailing list archives
Re: comcast ipv6 PTR
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl org>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:09:57 +0200
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:55:50PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Many mail servers require it as a minimum standard for speaking to their MTA.Random end users shouldn't be talking to MTAs. They should be using MSAs instead.
Given what TLAs have been caught doing lately, end users should be *encouraged* to run their own MTAs.
Current thread:
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR, (continued)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Brielle Bruns (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Andrew Sullivan (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Jimmy Hess (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR - DNSSEC bmanning (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR - DNSSEC Barry Shein (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR John Levine (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Chris Adams (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Eugen Leitl (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Barry Shein (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Cutler James R (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR John R. Levine (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Mark Andrews (Oct 14)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Lee Howard (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Joe Abley (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR John R. Levine (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Joe Abley (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR John R. Levine (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Mark Andrews (Oct 15)