nanog mailing list archives

Re: comcast ipv6 PTR


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () mykolab com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 10:36:31 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/9/2013 10:08 AM, Chris Adams wrote:

Once upon a time, Paul Ferguson<fergdawgster () mykolab com>  said:
>That's not necessarily true -- some (very large) organizations using
>DMARC will reject mail from hosts without a PTR record.

And that's a good reason to have reverse records for you mail servers.

Indeed. :-)

Auto-generated reverse really shouldn't be trusted for anything.

True. :-)

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 10.2.0 (Build 2317)
Charset: utf-8

wj8DBQFSVZPSq1pz9mNUZTMRAmVHAKCbyB6whUKbQ5Sl73+TMSE0TRcS5gCdEcZx
yXmgvG3kRpJIMRWhNNjUwag=
=CvKl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Paul Ferguson
Vice President, Threat Intelligence
Internet Identity, Tacoma, Washington  USA
IID --> "Connect and Collaborate" --> www.internetidentity.com


Current thread: