nanog mailing list archives
Re: Meraki
From: Sean Lazar <knife () toaster net>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:26:43 -0800
Meraki did not work for me in a high density office environment, with heavy wireless usage. Kept dropping clients at peak times. We went with Aruba. On 11/19/13 9:25 AM, Hank Disuko wrote:
Hi folks, I've traditionally been a Cisco Catalyst shop for my switching gear. I am doing a significant hardware refresh in one of my offices, which will entail replacing about 20 access switches and a couple core devices. Pretty simple L3 VLAN environment with VRRP/HSRP, on the physical end I have 1G fibre/copper and 10G fibre. My core switch of choice will likely be the Cat 4500 series. I'm considering Cisco's Meraki platform for my access layer and I'm looking for deployment stories of folks that have deployed Meraki in the past...good/bad/ugly kinda stuff. I know Meraki hardcores were upset when Cisco acquired them, but not exactly sure why. Anyway, any thoughts would be useful. Thanks! -Hank
Current thread:
- Re: Meraki, (continued)
- Re: Meraki Ricky Beam (Nov 20)
- Re: Meraki Warren Bailey (Nov 20)
- Re: Meraki Christopher Morrow (Nov 20)
- Re: Meraki Warren Bailey (Nov 20)
- RE: Meraki Meshier, Brent (Nov 21)
- Re: Meraki Shawn L (Nov 19)
- Re: Meraki Glenn Robuck (Nov 19)
- Re: Meraki Mike Lyon (Nov 19)
- Re: Meraki Warren Bailey (Nov 19)
- RE: Meraki Dustin Jurman (Nov 20)
- Re: Meraki Seth Mos (Nov 21)
- Re: Meraki Ray Soucy (Nov 22)
- Re: Meraki Warren Bailey (Nov 22)
- RE: Meraki Eric C. Miller (Nov 23)
- Re: Meraki Mike (Nov 24)
- Re: Meraki Brielle Bruns (Nov 24)