nanog mailing list archives

Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:40:36 -0400

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net> wrote:
It's also not a bad idea for an ISP to deploy EGRESS filters if they do not
offer BGP Transit services.

Nor is it a bad idea for their upstream to inquire as to whether the
downstream offers BGP transit services and apply INGRESS filters if
they do not.

This way they are not depending on their transit
providers to handle spoof protection and they cover their entire network
regardless of last mile ingress filtering. This doesn't generally work well
when doing transit services of any size due to the number of egress filter
updates you'd have to issue, but it is great for the small/medium ISP.

Build a web page where a downstream can set the filters on his
interface at his convenience. Apply some basic sanity checks against
wide-open. Worry about small lies from a forensic after-the-fact
perspective. This problem has a trivial technology-only solution.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: