nanog mailing list archives

Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty


From: Darius Jahandarie <djahandarie () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:19:36 -0400

(Mobile device)

On Mar 26, 2013, at 11:06 AM,Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:51:45 -0400, Jay Ashworth said:

Do we need to define a flag day, say one year hence, and start making the
sales pitch to our Corporate Overlords that we need to apply the IDP to
edge connections which cannot prove they've implemented BCP38 (or at very
least, the source address spoofing provisions thereof)?

How would one prove this?  (In particular, consider the test "have them
download the spoofer code from SAIL and run it" - I'm positive there will
be sites that will put in a /32 block for the test machine so it "fails"
to spoof but leave it open for the rest of the net).

Well, I'm not sure this is what's being suggested by Jay, but many peering agreements/policies have something in them 
that say "prevent spoofing to best effort". Such statements could be strengthened in a global effort, and then spoofed 
source addresses could lead to depeering much faster/harder than what happens today. It would be reactionary rather 
than proactive, but still better than what we have now where spoofing is kind of like "it can't be helped".

-- 
Darius Jahandarie

Current thread: