nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:06:05 -0400
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:51:45 -0400, Jay Ashworth said:
Do we need to define a flag day, say one year hence, and start making the sales pitch to our Corporate Overlords that we need to apply the IDP to edge connections which cannot prove they've implemented BCP38 (or at very least, the source address spoofing provisions thereof)?
How would one prove this? (In particular, consider the test "have them download the spoofer code from SAIL and run it" - I'm positive there will be sites that will put in a /32 block for the test machine so it "fails" to spoof but leave it open for the rest of the net).
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jay Ashworth (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Dobbins, Roland (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jared Mauch (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jimmy Hess (Mar 27)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jay Ashworth (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Darius Jahandarie (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jared Mauch (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jared Mauch (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty bmanning (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Dobbins, Roland (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jay Ashworth (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty William Herrin (Mar 26)
- Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty Jay Ashworth (Mar 26)