Re: Intermapper vs NetBrain vs some other for NMS

[Jason Lixfeld <jason () lixfeld ca>]

I'd also be very interested in what's out there.  I have similar grievances with InterMapper, but at this point, it 
sucks far less than anything else I've tried.

I just poked around NetBrain's site and am immediately deterred by it's reliance on a Windows backend, so that's out 
for me.  I did use OpenNMS for a while before switching to InterMapper, but ONMS's discovery/mapping was very broken at 
the time, it was a PITA to set up and manage and I don't know if it's gotten much getter in the last couple of years 
since.

I've tried things like ManageEngine, but it's far too bloated and complex for what I need.

On 2013-03-08, at 11:38 AM, Ben Bartsch <uwcableguy () gmail com> wrote:

> Hi all:
>
> I'm looking for information anyone might have comparing Intermapper to
> NetBrain for NMS.  Stuff like devices up/down, interface utilization,
> building maps for documentation, etc.  IMO, Intermapper works great, when
> it works.  Tech support has been slow and often cannot fix the problems,
> not to mention they release updates about once every other week.
>
> Anyone familiar with any similar products?  We are presently evaluating
> NetBrain and it seems really nice.  We really like the Visio-like aspect of
> it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Ben