nanog mailing list archives
Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table?
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 22 Jun 2013 05:14:31 -0000
The forwarding hardware is generally going to be the limit, and that's going to be painful enough as we approach a half million prefixes.
I would expect that we might finally see some pushback against networks that announce lots of disaggregated prefixes. The current CIDR report notes that the 400K prefixes could be 260K if aggregated. I realize it's not quite that simple due to issues of longer prefixes taking precedence over shorter ones, but it is my impression that there's a lot of sloppiness.
Current thread:
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table?, (continued)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Brandon Martin (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Owen DeLong (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? John Curran (Jun 22)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? shawn wilson (Jun 22)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Grzegorz Janoszka (Jun 22)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 24)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Arturo Servin (Jun 25)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? William Herrin (Jun 22)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Masataka Ohta (Jun 24)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? joel jaeggli (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? jim deleskie (Jun 24)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 24)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Michael McConnell (Jun 24)