nanog mailing list archives

Re: Network Vendor suggestions/reviews, Arista Networks, Dell Force10, Juniper, Extreme Networks etc...


From: Phil Fagan <philfagan () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:14:18 -0600

Mike brings up a good point though; the effort, cost, and risk of
introducing a new CLI to an environment sometimes is masked until you
really need to dig in and work through outages. Familiarity with a codebase
or at least with how the code "thinks" should go a long way when deciding
what to put in your racks. Of course, how do you quantify that?


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design () gmail com>wrote:

I'm exact opposite of Phil.  I love IOS and hate JunOS....for that
single reason, I'm really against buying Juniper in our shop for
pretty much anything.  :)

Still, to be fair, the hardware seems to be really, really stable and
well built.  I don't think we've had a failure across our Junipers in
the short time I've been with my day job.

As far as support goes...the only time we had issues with our Nexus
gear I was actually really, really disappointed with Cisco.  We were
upgrading our firmware, ran into some major issues with VPC and HSRP
due some firmware changes, and the Tac engineer we got sucked
*massive* lemons.  When I call Tac with a situation like this, I
expect someone who can code a working config from scratch based on the
old config, not someone who's going to sit there scratching his head,
running useless packet captures, and being silent when we ask
questions.  *sigh*

/rant off

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan () gmail com> wrote:
I've had nothing but good luck with Juniper support and well with Cisco
you
pay for support too. I will say Arista support was great, however, I'm
still hesitant to put them in full production; but I think that is lack
of
experience with them speaking.

Do the bake off in your lab and let'm run!


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List <
blake.mailinglist () pfankuch me> wrote:

 Let me also clarify, Price per port is not the final deciding factor.
We are looking much more at a combination of daily operational sanity,
troubleshooting features, operational feature set, vendor support
quality
and price.****

** **

Support is absolute key.  When we need help, we need help quickly and
knowledgeable support.  The name checkpoint comes to mind when I think
of
something I DON’T want for support quality.  It also causes nausea…****

** **

Thanks,****

** **

Blake****

** **

*From:* Phil Fagan [mailto:philfagan () gmail com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 18, 2013 6:08 PM
*To:* Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List
*Cc:* NANOG (nanog () nanog org)
*Subject:* Re: Network Vendor suggestions/reviews, Arista Networks, Dell
Force10, Juniper, Extreme Networks etc...****

** **

I love JUNOS, don't really care for IOS. I really trust Cisco and
Juniper's hardware, with that being said Arista is your best bet for
cheapest port. I've only seen Arista in lab, not in the wild yet so I
can't
speak for how I would trust them. You mention getting bit by single
sups, I
believe as of late Arista has had issue with OSPF failover time between
dual-sups in HA setups.****

** **

I used to have a Dell laptop....but I'm sure their great too. In the end
for me I only trust Cisco or Juniper. I've been burnt by Foundry and am
waiting to on Arista. ****

** **

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List <
blake.mailinglist () pfankuch me> wrote:****

Howdy,
                I have been working on a proposal for the organization I
work for to move into the 10gbit datacenter.  We have a small datacenter
currently of about 1000 ports of 1gbit.  We have traditionally been a
full
Cisco shop, however I was asked to do a price comparison as well as
features with other major alternative vendors.  I was also asked to do
some
digging as far as what "the real world" thinks about these possible
vendors.

We currently have 2 Cisco 6509's with 8 48 port cards Sup 3BXL, 2 Cisco
4506 with 5x 48 port card and Sup V's and 2 4900M switches providing
10gbit
to a very specialized implementation.  With all of our technology, we
try
to not be bleeding edge, but oozing edge.  We need 5 9's or more of
uptime
yearly so stability is preferable to cool features.  We currently have
single supervisors in all of our switches (not my decision) and it has
bit
us recently.  Everything we are looking at needs to support NSF/SSO/VSS
of
some kind.

What we have been looking to replace it with in Cisco world is Nexus
7004
Core and Nexus 5596UP with 2200 series Fabric extenders for Dist/Access
as
well as 2200 Fabric Extenders within our Dell Blade Chassis.
 Realistically
we will be under 800 ports of 10gbit (excluding Blades) which puts us
in a
tough spot from what I can find.  Currently everything we have is EOR,
however TOR would make more sense allowing us to switch to SFP+ twinax
connectivity to servers.

With this in mind, I have a few questions...

It was mandated that I look at a company "Arista Networks" and
investigate
possible options.  I had not heard much about them, so I look to the
experts.  Pro's and Con's?  Real world experience?  Looks to me they
have a
lot of cool features, but I'm slightly concerned with how new they might
be, how reliable it would be as well as their QA/bugfix history.  Also
24x4
support and hardware replacement.  Everything in our datacenter
currently
has a 2 or 4 hour cisco contract on it and critical core components
have a
cold spare in inventory.

Dell Force 10... I know Dell tries to get you to drink the Koolaid on
this
solution, I was a former Dell Partner and they even pushed me to get
demo
equipment going...  What's the experience with their chassis switches?
 Stability?  Configuration sanity?  What do people like?  What do people
hate?

Juniper.  What do people like? What do people hate?  Have the Layer 2
issues of historical age gone away?  Is the config still xml ish?  It
has
been about 5 years since I worked with anything Juniper.

Extreme networks.  I know very little about them historically.  What is
good, what is bad?  Is the config sane?

I would be happy to compile any information I find, as well as our
sanitized internal conclusions.  On and off list responses welcome.

If there is another vendor anyone would suggest, please add them to the
list with similarly asked questions.

Thanks!

Blake****



****

** **

-- ****

Phil Fagan****

Denver, CO****

970-480-7618****




--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618



--
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0




-- 
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618


Current thread: