nanog mailing list archives

RE: Network Vendor suggestions/reviews, Arista Networks, Dell Force10, Juniper, Extreme Networks etc...


From: Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List <blake.mailinglist () pfankuch me>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:31:44 +0000

Let me also clarify, Price per port is not the final deciding factor.  We are looking much more at a combination of 
daily operational sanity, troubleshooting features, operational feature set, vendor support quality and price.

Support is absolute key.  When we need help, we need help quickly and knowledgeable support.  The name checkpoint comes 
to mind when I think of something I DON’T want for support quality.  It also causes nausea…

Thanks,

Blake

From: Phil Fagan [mailto:philfagan () gmail com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 6:08 PM
To: Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List
Cc: NANOG (nanog () nanog org)
Subject: Re: Network Vendor suggestions/reviews, Arista Networks, Dell Force10, Juniper, Extreme Networks etc...

I love JUNOS, don't really care for IOS. I really trust Cisco and Juniper's hardware, with that being said Arista is 
your best bet for cheapest port. I've only seen Arista in lab, not in the wild yet so I can't speak for how I would 
trust them. You mention getting bit by single sups, I believe as of late Arista has had issue with OSPF failover time 
between dual-sups in HA setups.

I used to have a Dell laptop....but I'm sure their great too. In the end for me I only trust Cisco or Juniper. I've 
been burnt by Foundry and am waiting to on Arista.

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List <blake.mailinglist () pfankuch 
me<mailto:blake.mailinglist () pfankuch me>> wrote:
Howdy,
                I have been working on a proposal for the organization I work for to move into the 10gbit datacenter.  
We have a small datacenter currently of about 1000 ports of 1gbit.  We have traditionally been a full Cisco shop, 
however I was asked to do a price comparison as well as features with other major alternative vendors.  I was also 
asked to do some digging as far as what "the real world" thinks about these possible vendors.

We currently have 2 Cisco 6509's with 8 48 port cards Sup 3BXL, 2 Cisco 4506 with 5x 48 port card and Sup V's and 2 
4900M switches providing 10gbit to a very specialized implementation.  With all of our technology, we try to not be 
bleeding edge, but oozing edge.  We need 5 9's or more of uptime yearly so stability is preferable to cool features.  
We currently have single supervisors in all of our switches (not my decision) and it has bit us recently.  Everything 
we are looking at needs to support NSF/SSO/VSS of some kind.

What we have been looking to replace it with in Cisco world is Nexus 7004 Core and Nexus 5596UP with 2200 series Fabric 
extenders for Dist/Access as well as 2200 Fabric Extenders within our Dell Blade Chassis.  Realistically we will be 
under 800 ports of 10gbit (excluding Blades) which puts us in a tough spot from what I can find.  Currently everything 
we have is EOR, however TOR would make more sense allowing us to switch to SFP+ twinax connectivity to servers.

With this in mind, I have a few questions...

It was mandated that I look at a company "Arista Networks" and investigate possible options.  I had not heard much 
about them, so I look to the experts.  Pro's and Con's?  Real world experience?  Looks to me they have a lot of cool 
features, but I'm slightly concerned with how new they might be, how reliable it would be as well as their QA/bugfix 
history.  Also 24x4 support and hardware replacement.  Everything in our datacenter currently has a 2 or 4 hour cisco 
contract on it and critical core components have a cold spare in inventory.

Dell Force 10... I know Dell tries to get you to drink the Koolaid on this solution, I was a former Dell Partner and 
they even pushed me to get demo equipment going...  What's the experience with their chassis switches?  Stability?  
Configuration sanity?  What do people like?  What do people hate?

Juniper.  What do people like? What do people hate?  Have the Layer 2 issues of historical age gone away?  Is the 
config still xml ish?  It has been about 5 years since I worked with anything Juniper.

Extreme networks.  I know very little about them historically.  What is good, what is bad?  Is the config sane?

I would be happy to compile any information I find, as well as our sanitized internal conclusions.  On and off list 
responses welcome.

If there is another vendor anyone would suggest, please add them to the list with similarly asked questions.

Thanks!

Blake



--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618

Current thread: